- #CINEBENCH RESULTS 64 BIT#
- #CINEBENCH RESULTS UPDATE#
- #CINEBENCH RESULTS PRO#
- #CINEBENCH RESULTS TRIAL#
#CINEBENCH RESULTS UPDATE#
What would I gain (or can expect) if I were to OC the RAM to 1600? or is it recommended I leave it as is. We will update this page from time to time as we gather results for various Macs running release 20 of the cross-platform Cinebench CPU benchmarking tool. Temp - Max Temp was 66C (lowest was 25C).Īre these numbers too high for either Power, VID or Temp or they are good and I am on my way to a happy system?Īs for RAM, I assume from what I read, chaning to XMP Profile 1 to get 1600 is not going to make a huge difference and for me I need 24/7 stable film/audio machine and don't want to cause any issues. Power - It went from 88watts (in first 20 mins) to about 98-100 watts for most of the time. Ran the test for 3 hours and at the end the results were:
#CINEBENCH RESULTS 64 BIT#
Will 64bit tests make a difference? Should I get the 64 bit and what can I expect as my results from there or will 32bit suffice.
#CINEBENCH RESULTS TRIAL#
**I used the free trial version with 32bit only. I am running the system with the Corsair H60 Liquid Cooler on it.Īre these results okay and around what should be expected? Ran Cinebench, Geekbench and Prime for 3 hours. If you have any questions about the commenting policy, please let us know through the Contact Page.Building a CustoMac Hackintosh: Buyer's Guideįirst time OC, Got the system setup with a 43x multiplier (4.3 Ghz) with Intel Turbo Boost Disabled RAM still running at 1333MHz (not at 1600).If you would like to appeal for a comment section ban to be removed, please use this page.VideoCardz Moderating Team reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to the site without notice.Please also note that comments that attack or harass an individual directly will result in a ban without warning. A failure to comply with these rules will result in a warning and, in extreme cases, a ban.Comments complaining about the article subject or its source will be removed.Note this may include abusive, threatening, pornographic, offensive, misleading, or libelous language. Comments and usernames containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive will be deleted.Discussions about politics are not allowed on this website. Including a link to relevant content is permitted, but comments should be relevant to the post topic. Comments deemed to be spam or solely promotional in nature will be deleted.The website has only provided multi-threaded results. Do note that the results feature MTP power settings. Cinebench R20 and R23 results were also shared for 12 and 10-core K-series CPUs. Intel Alder Lake-S flagship SKU wasn’t the only one tested by TweakPC. Intel Core i9-12900K with air cooling, Source: TweakPC With the power limit at maximum, the CPU has quickly reached 100☌ just 4 minutes after the test has begun:
#CINEBENCH RESULTS PRO#
The CPU was also tested with a Dark Rock Pro 4 air cooler, which shows a slightly different picture. Intel Core i9-12900K performance per power limit, Source: TweakPC The test was performed with liquid cooling, which prevented the CPU from overheating over 81☌, the author notes. As reported earlier, with Alder Lake, Intel introduces a new naming scheme for power consumption figures, replacing TDP with Processor Base Power and PL2 (Power Limit 2) with Maximum Turbo Power.Īccording to the results, the Core i9-12900K gains nearly 28% performance with a power limit increased from 125W (PBP) to 241W (MTP). The website tested the flagship model with four different power limit settings, illustrating how much more performance comes at higher power consumption. All those SKUs are to launch officially tomorrow. German TweakPC has some last-minute benchmarks results featuring 16-core Core i9-12900K, 12-core Core i7-12700K, and 10-core Core i5-12600K CPUs. TweakPC delivers benchmark scores of the Alder Lake lineup. Intel Core i9-12900K tested in Cinebench with air and liquid cooling
0 kommentar(er)
